<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Drew Meyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: My Thoughts on the Dept of Justice Decision &#124; Personal Insights on Web 2.0, Blogging, and Business</title>
		<link>http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-68742</link>
		<dc:creator>My Thoughts on the Dept of Justice Decision &#124; Personal Insights on Web 2.0, Blogging, and Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/#comment-68742</guid>
		<description>[...] decided it is okay for internet service providers to charge a premium for priority web traffic. I wrote about the issue of &#8220;Net neutrality&#8221; back in March and my thinking still hasn&#8217;t changed on the issue &#8212; ISP&#8217;s being able to charge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decided it is okay for internet service providers to charge a premium for priority web traffic. I wrote about the issue of &#8220;Net neutrality&#8221; back in March and my thinking still hasn&#8217;t changed on the issue &#8212; ISP&#8217;s being able to charge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-20440</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 06:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/#comment-20440</guid>
		<description>Another resource on the net neutrality issue www.copowi.com which suggests the solution is neither legislation nor the free market alone. It proposes the idea that content consumers/producers (web 2.0) now become direct stakeholders in the infrastructure (web 3.0). Check out www.copowi.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another resource on the net neutrality issue <a href="http://www.copowi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copowi.com</a> which suggests the solution is neither legislation nor the free market alone. It proposes the idea that content consumers/producers (web 2.0) now become direct stakeholders in the infrastructure (web 3.0). Check out <a href="http://www.copowi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copowi.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandsOff</title>
		<link>http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-20225</link>
		<dc:creator>HandsOff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/#comment-20225</guid>
		<description>For a more complete understanding of the issues surrounding net neutrality, I&#039;d suggest that you also check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFurcOLYAjk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; and visit my coalition at &lt;a href=&quot;www.handsoff.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.handsoff.org&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a more complete understanding of the issues surrounding net neutrality, I&#8217;d suggest that you also check out <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFurcOLYAjk" rel="nofollow">this video</a> and visit my coalition at <a href="www.handsoff.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.handsoff.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tisza</title>
		<link>http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-19973</link>
		<dc:creator>Tisza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewmeyersinsights.com/2007/03/31/net-neutrality/#comment-19973</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Wow, that sure is some scary stuff.  I had heard that the cellular companies were working on utilizing the gps technology in the newer cell phones to try to begin sending location specific advertising directly to our units.  But, I had not heard anything about this.

I agree that this idea pretty much SUCKS.  This ranks right up there with taxing drivers based on the number of miles driven each year.  We already pay for the costs associated with the driving of those miles (fuel, maintenance, insurance)where is the justification for making an additional fee for wanting to utilize what we have already paid for.

The internet is, and should remain, as level a playing field as it can be.  Controlling access to information and the speed with which the information is delivered, based upon whether or not the site has ponied up the cash strikes me as having more akin to paying for &quot;laundry&quot; just like in the old days when Capone&#039;s guys would &quot;press your shirts&quot; for a small, but manditory fee than it does advertising.

Just my two cents.  Thank you for putting this topic on my radar.

Take care, help lots of people and have a great day!

Tisza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Wow, that sure is some scary stuff.  I had heard that the cellular companies were working on utilizing the gps technology in the newer cell phones to try to begin sending location specific advertising directly to our units.  But, I had not heard anything about this.</p>
<p>I agree that this idea pretty much SUCKS.  This ranks right up there with taxing drivers based on the number of miles driven each year.  We already pay for the costs associated with the driving of those miles (fuel, maintenance, insurance)where is the justification for making an additional fee for wanting to utilize what we have already paid for.</p>
<p>The internet is, and should remain, as level a playing field as it can be.  Controlling access to information and the speed with which the information is delivered, based upon whether or not the site has ponied up the cash strikes me as having more akin to paying for &#8220;laundry&#8221; just like in the old days when Capone&#8217;s guys would &#8220;press your shirts&#8221; for a small, but manditory fee than it does advertising.</p>
<p>Just my two cents.  Thank you for putting this topic on my radar.</p>
<p>Take care, help lots of people and have a great day!</p>
<p>Tisza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

